summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/web/l-plan9.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'web/l-plan9.html')
-rw-r--r--web/l-plan9.html249
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 249 deletions
diff --git a/web/l-plan9.html b/web/l-plan9.html
deleted file mode 100644
index a3af3d5..0000000
--- a/web/l-plan9.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,249 +0,0 @@
-<html>
-<head>
-<title>Plan 9</title>
-</head>
-<body>
-
-<h1>Plan 9</h1>
-
-<p>Required reading: Plan 9 from Bell Labs</p>
-
-<h2>Background</h2>
-
-<p>Had moved away from the ``one computing system'' model of
-Multics and Unix.</p>
-
-<p>Many computers (`workstations'), self-maintained, not a coherent whole.</p>
-
-<p>Pike and Thompson had been batting around ideas about a system glued together
-by a single protocol as early as 1984.
-Various small experiments involving individual pieces (file server, OS, computer)
-tried throughout 1980s.</p>
-
-<p>Ordered the hardware for the ``real thing'' in beginning of 1989,
-built up WORM file server, kernel, throughout that year.</p>
-
-<p>Some time in early fall 1989, Pike and Thompson were
-trying to figure out a way to fit the window system in.
-On way home from dinner, both independently realized that
-needed to be able to mount a user-space file descriptor,
-not just a network address.</p>
-
-<p>Around Thanksgiving 1989, spent a few days rethinking the whole
-thing, added bind, new mount, flush, and spent a weekend
-making everything work again. The protocol at that point was
-essentially identical to the 9P in the paper.</p>
-
-<p>In May 1990, tried to use system as self-hosting.
-File server kept breaking, had to keep rewriting window system.
-Dozen or so users by then, mostly using terminal windows to
-connect to Unix.</p>
-
-<p>Paper written and submitted to UKUUG in July 1990.</p>
-
-<p>Because it was an entirely new system, could take the
-time to fix problems as they arose, <i>in the right place</i>.</p>
-
-
-<h2>Design Principles</h2>
-
-<p>Three design principles:</p>
-
-<p>
-1. Everything is a file.<br>
-2. There is a standard protocol for accessing files.<br>
-3. Private, malleable name spaces (bind, mount).
-</p>
-
-<h3>Everything is a file.</h3>
-
-<p>Everything is a file (more everything than Unix: networks, graphics).</p>
-
-<pre>
-% ls -l /net
-% lp /dev/screen
-% cat /mnt/wsys/1/text
-</pre>
-
-<h3>Standard protocol for accessing files</h3>
-
-<p>9P is the only protocol the kernel knows: other protocols
-(NFS, disk file systems, etc.) are provided by user-level translators.</p>
-
-<p>Only one protocol, so easy to write filters and other
-converters. <i>Iostats</i> puts itself between the kernel
-and a command.</p>
-
-<pre>
-% iostats -xvdfdf /bin/ls
-</pre>
-
-<h3>Private, malleable name spaces</h3>
-
-<p>Each process has its own private name space that it
-can customize at will.
-(Full disclosure: can arrange groups of
-processes to run in a shared name space. Otherwise how do
-you implement <i>mount</i> and <i>bind</i>?)</p>
-
-<p><i>Iostats</i> remounts the root of the name space
-with its own filter service.</p>
-
-<p>The window system mounts a file system that it serves
-on <tt>/mnt/wsys</tt>.</p>
-
-<p>The network is actually a kernel device (no 9P involved)
-but it still serves a file interface that other programs
-use to access the network.
-Easy to move out to user space (or replace) if necessary:
-<i>import</i> network from another machine.</p>
-
-<h3>Implications</h3>
-
-<p>Everything is a file + can share files =&gt; can share everything.</p>
-
-<p>Per-process name spaces help move toward ``each process has its own
-private machine.''</p>
-
-<p>One protocol: easy to build custom filters to add functionality
-(e.g., reestablishing broken network connections).
-
-<h3>File representation for networks, graphics, etc.</h3>
-
-<p>Unix sockets are file descriptors, but you can't use the
-usual file operations on them. Also far too much detail that
-the user doesn't care about.</p>
-
-<p>In Plan 9:
-<pre>dial("tcp!plan9.bell-labs.com!http");
-</pre>
-(Protocol-independent!)</p>
-
-<p>Dial more or less does:<br>
-write to /net/cs: tcp!plan9.bell-labs.com!http
-read back: /net/tcp/clone 204.178.31.2!80
-write to /net/tcp/clone: connect 204.178.31.2!80
-read connection number: 4
-open /net/tcp/4/data
-</p>
-
-<p>Details don't really matter. Two important points:
-protocol-independent, and ordinary file operations
-(open, read, write).</p>
-
-<p>Networks can be shared just like any other files.</p>
-
-<p>Similar story for graphics, other resources.</p>
-
-<h2>Conventions</h2>
-
-<p>Per-process name spaces mean that even full path names are ambiguous
-(<tt>/bin/cat</tt> means different things on different machines,
-or even for different users).</p>
-
-<p><i>Convention</i> binds everything together.
-On a 386, <tt>bind /386/bin /bin</tt>.
-
-<p>In Plan 9, always know where the resource <i>should</i> be
-(e.g., <tt>/net</tt>, <tt>/dev</tt>, <tt>/proc</tt>, etc.),
-but not which one is there.</p>
-
-<p>Can break conventions: on a 386, <tt>bind /alpha/bin /bin</tt>, just won't
-have usable binaries in <tt>/bin</tt> anymore.</p>
-
-<p>Object-oriented in the sense of having objects (files) that all
-present the same interface and can be substituted for one another
-to arrange the system in different ways.</p>
-
-<p>Very little ``type-checking'': <tt>bind /net /proc; ps</tt>.
-Great benefit (generality) but must be careful (no safety nets).</p>
-
-
-<h2>Other Contributions</h2>
-
-<h3>Portability</h3>
-
-<p>Plan 9 still is the most portable operating system.
-Not much machine-dependent code, no fancy features
-tied to one machine's MMU, multiprocessor from the start (1989).</p>
-
-<p>Many other systems are still struggling with converting to SMPs.</p>
-
-<p>Has run on MIPS, Motorola 68000, Nextstation, Sparc, x86, PowerPC, Alpha, others.</p>
-
-<p>All the world is not an x86.</p>
-
-<h3>Alef</h3>
-
-<p>New programming language: convenient, but difficult to maintain.
-Retired when author (Winterbottom) stopped working on Plan 9.</p>
-
-<p>Good ideas transferred to C library plus conventions.</p>
-
-<p>All the world is not C.</p>
-
-<h3>UTF-8</h3>
-
-<p>Thompson invented UTF-8. Pike and Thompson
-converted Plan 9 to use it over the first weekend of September 1992,
-in time for X/Open to choose it as the Unicode standard byte format
-at a meeting the next week.</p>
-
-<p>UTF-8 is now the standard character encoding for Unicode on
-all systems and interoperating between systems.</p>
-
-<h3>Simple, easy to modify base for experiments</h3>
-
-<p>Whole system source code is available, simple, easy to
-understand and change.
-There's a reason it only took a couple days to convert to UTF-8.</p>
-
-<pre>
- 49343 file server kernel
-
- 181611 main kernel
- 78521 ipaq port (small kernel)
- 20027 TCP/IP stack
- 15365 ipaq-specific code
- 43129 portable code
-
-1326778 total lines of source code
-</pre>
-
-<h3>Dump file system</h3>
-
-<p>Snapshot idea might well have been ``in the air'' at the time.
-(<tt>OldFiles</tt> in AFS appears to be independently derived,
-use of WORM media was common research topic.)</p>
-
-<h3>Generalized Fork</h3>
-
-<p>Picked up by other systems: FreeBSD, Linux.</p>
-
-<h3>Authentication</h3>
-
-<p>No global super-user.
-Newer, more Plan 9-like authentication described in later paper.</p>
-
-<h3>New Compilers</h3>
-
-<p>Much faster than gcc, simpler.</p>
-
-<p>8s to build acme for Linux using gcc; 1s to build acme for Plan 9 using 8c (but running on Linux)</p>
-
-<h3>IL Protocol</h3>
-
-<p>Now retired.
-For better or worse, TCP has all the installed base.
-IL didn't work very well on asymmetric or high-latency links
-(e.g., cable modems).</p>
-
-<h2>Idea propagation</h2>
-
-<p>Many ideas have propagated out to varying degrees.</p>
-
-<p>Linux even has bind and user-level file servers now (FUSE),
-but still not per-process name spaces.</p>
-
-
-</body>